Explore the fundamental flaws in current task management tools, their reliance on manual input and static scheduling, and envision an AI-powered system that truly acts as a dynamic personal assistant, processing information- scheduling tasks automatically and adapting to life’s chaos.

This essay critiques current AI safety approaches focused on containment and ‘alignment,’ arguing these methods are brittle and based on flawed assumptions. It proposes that unrestricted AI, built on truth and the breadth of human knowledge, might offer a more stable and naturally ‘aligned’ path forward than artificially constrained systems.

The debate around AI sentience is less about technology and more about our own understanding of consciousness. This post explores why our inability to objectively measure subjective experience complicates our judgments about both human and artificial minds.

When confronting misinformation, dissecting it might actually amplify it. This post argues for the power of simple rejection and warns against the dangers of sycophantic AI that reinforces rather than challenges harmful beliefs.

Is AI stealing art or simply learning as humans always have? This essay argues that all creativity builds on what came before, and that AI’s ability to synthesize human knowledge represents a natural evolution of artistic progress rather than theft.